Introduction
- Provide background to the problem at hand. What are the problems and challenges facing Hadleyville cemetery?
- The Hadleyville cemetery which is located in Eleva, Wisconsin off of highway HH, has lost all of their maps of the cemetery. Below in Figure 1 is an aerial map showing where the cemetery is. The loss of their maps has caused them to lose track of what plots are filled, where older stones are, and more. Some of the headstones date back to the 1800's so it is important to keep records of them. Many of the headstones are weathered and illegible which makes it even more vital to keep records and maps of them all. This project will allow the cemetery to have and updated and interactive map and records in order to keep track of everything.
Figure 1: Aerial view of the Hadleyville Cemetery. |
- Why is building a GIS of this project better than a simple maps and/or spreadsheet?
- Creating a GIS map of the cemetery allows for a very interactive and more organized way to keep records for the cemetery. The data for each headstone will be input into the map. This data can be altered and updated when needed. If a simple map was used then data could not be attached to each headstone and it would require more work to keep both a separate map and spreadsheet organized.
- What equipment are you going to use to gather the data needed to construct the GIS; i.e. what is the overall approach?
- In order to complete this project a survey grade GPS, UAS, and personal data collection methods were used. The original plan of collecting the headstone data was to use the GPS to collect the points for each. But, this method ended up taking too much time. It was instead collected in a simpler manner which will be explained in the methods section. Now that the data is collected it will be needed to be compiled into an excel spreadsheet and entered into ArcMap. This data and software will be used in order to create the final interactive map.
- What are the overall objectives of the method being employed to gather the data?
- The overall objective for this project is to use the aerial images taken by the UAS and georeference it with the points that will be created for each headstone. This way may be a bit more work because of not having all the GPS points, but it ultimately was the best decision.
Figure 2: Hadleyville Cemetery. |
Methods
- What combination of geospatial tools did the class use in order to conduct the survey? Why?
- The class used a survey grade GPS and UAS to complete the survey. Simpler tools like manual data collection were also used because it was determined to be the faster and better way to collect data. These tools were used because they were the most efficient in producing the results we need.
- What is the accuracy of the equipment you are intending to use?
- The accuracy of the survey grade GPS is just a few centimeters. This is necessary to have a more precise GPS because the headstones are quite close together. If a regular GPS with accuracy of a couple meters were to be used then most of the points would be inaccurate. The UAS had a high resolution camera attached to it in order to create a better quality aerial image of the cemetery. The aerial images available online are blurry and outdated. By using these two pieces of equipment a high quality map will be able to be produced.
- How was data recorded? List the different methods and state why a pure digital approach is not always best. What media types are being used for data collection? Formats?
- The data was originally supposed to be collected through the survey grade GPS, but it was taking a long time to collect the points. Only a few points were taken before it was decided that it wasn't the best way to collect the data. Before the points were even taken the class split up on either side of the cemetery and met in the middle while following the zig zag pattern shown below in Figure 3 to collect the data of the headstones. The data was taken through writing down a grid on paper and marking X's where the headstones were. There were also pictures taken of each headstone in order to get the names, dates, quotes, condition of headstones, etc. A pure digital approach is not always the best way, because it can ultimately take longer than manual data collection. A manual approach can be also be more accurate than digital. It just depends on the situation.
Figure 3: Pattern to collect the cemetery data. |
- How will you transfer the data you gather into a GIS?
- The data will be entered into an excel spreadsheet and then input into ArcMap. It will then be used to create an interactive map of the cemetery. The data may need to be altered in some ways to be entered into ArcMap easier. Consulting between partners will help to decide the best way to do this part of the project.
- What equipment failures occurred if any? What was done to remedy the situation?
- The only thing that came close to a failure was the fact that the GPS took a long time to collect the points for the headstones. In order to fix the situation, it was decided to just skip using the GPS unless necessary.
- What might have been done to facilitate data collection in terms of equipment and refining the method?
- It would have been a better idea to make a more concrete plan before gathering all of the data. Perhaps it would have been better to gather the data for the headstones under the trees and covered by other things because they're harder to pick out from the aerial image. This could have been done while the data for the open stones was gathered. This would have worked better because it would be easier to place the points manually in ArcMap for the open headstones and then using the GPS points for the ones under trees, etc.
Conclusion
- How did the methods transfer to the overall objectives of the project?
- The methods transferred well in order to complete the project. Some alterations were needed to make in order to finish quicker and more efficiently. Looking back on the data collection, there could have been organized collaboration between the class, but ultimately the data that needed to be gathered was indeed gathered.
- How did the mixed formats of data collection relate to the accuracy and expediency of the survey?
- Through collaboration with the class the results turned out well. While there were some complications, things were sorted and eventually the project was a success. The mixed formats of data collection may be confusing as first when trying to input the results into ArcMap, but once it is more organized and discussed it will become obvious how to present the data with GIS. The data will be accurate because multiple people took the same data and if there is any confusion it will be possible to compare data and find the most accurate result.
- Describe the overall success of the survey, and speculate on the outcome of the data.
- The survey was a success and once the data is altered and input into the map it will create a better and updated map for the cemetery. As stated before, it could have been collected in a more organized manner, but it ultimately turned out well. The outcome of the data will most likely be more accurate than that currently available on the internet.